20091025

Protein Structure (a very, very short intro)

Before I get into more detail about what I'm working on, I thought I'd start by talking a little bit more about proteins and protein folding.


A protein has structure on several different scales.  The primary structure of a protein is just the sequence of amino acids in its polypeptide chain.  (Remember that a protein is made of one or more polypeptides, polymers made of amino acid monomers that are bound together end-to-end to make a long chain.)  The primary structure of a protein is related to the sequence of messenger RNA by the genetic code.  (Remember: DNA goes to mRNA goes to protein--with some notable exceptions that I can talk more about if you want.)  So we can design a protein with any primary sequence that we want by making a gene with the appropriate DNA sequence.


Proteins aren't just strings of amino acids, though.  That would be boring and probably useless.  Instead, proteins fold into complicated three-dimensional structures.  Some of these structures occur again and again in different proteins.  These basic motifs that occur again and again form what is called secondary structure.  There are several different common secondary structures:  

  • The alpha helix is a corkscrew-like arrangement of amino acids that forms because of bonding between every fourth amino acid in the sequence.  (Hydrogen bonding to be specific.)
  • The beta sheet is a sheet-like arrangement formed by parallel segments of the polypeptide chain.  Beta sheets are formed by another type of hydrogen bonding between amino acids in neighboring chains.
  • Other secondary structures:  The alpha helix and beta sheet are probably the most common secondary structure motifs.  Other secondary structures include turns and weirder types of helices like the 310 helix and the polyproline helix.

No human being (at least no one I know!) can easily predict what secondary structure a protein will be in just by looking at its primary sequence.  However, people have created sophisticated computer programs that predict secondary structure.  Here are some examples.  These programs sometimes work very well, but they aren't foolproof.  Often, the secondary structure of a particular segment is strongly influenced by interactions with other parts of the protein.  A segment of the polypeptide chain that forms an alpha helix in the full protein, for instance, may not form an alpha helix when it is on its own.

And that brings us to tertiary structure.  Tertiary structure is how all of the amino acids in the polypeptide chain are arranged in three dimensions.  The three-dimensional structure of each protein is extremely important for determining how it will function in the living organism.  Unfortunately, predicting how a protein will fold into its tertiary structure is very, very hard.  However, it is known that the information about how a protein will fold is somehow stored in its primary sequence of amino acids.  People have done classic experiments to show that small proteins can refold on their own after being unfolded by chemical treatment.


A protein typically folds into a well-defined structure determined only by its amino acid sequence.
But how can we predict how it will fold?  This is a huge problem!

So how can we decode the information in the protein's sequence of amino acids to determine how it will fold in three dimensions?  This is a question that scientists are still trying to answer, though most agree that the answer will have something to do with making computer models of protein structure and protein folding.  More on that next time...

20091010

Hi from Cambridge!

Hi Peterson students and friends! I've arrived at the University of Cambridge and started working on my new research project, which involves doing computer simulations of protein folding. I'm doing this work with Dr. Robert Best, a fellow in the Cambridge Department of Chemistry. I'd love to tell you all about it and answer any questions you might have.

This will hopefully be the first of a series of posts on my blog about what proteins are, how they fold into complicated 3D structures, and why that is important for life. I apologize in advance if some of what I'm saying is unclear. It will hopefully become clearer as I go on...

But first, here's an animation of one of my first simulations. The coiled tube represents an amino acid chain (a.k.a. polypeptide). You can see three major coiled parts of the chain that pack against each other. These are called alpha helices--more on those later. The structural motif that they form is called a three-helix bundle. The animation shows what happens to the simulated protein if you add to the simulation a strong pulling force between the two ends of the polypeptide chain. The protein quickly comes apart or unfolds. (People have actually done this sort of experiment in real life...but more on that later!)

20090204

A cool virtual lab

Check out this virtual transgenic fly-making lab...

http://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/vlabs/transgenic_fly/index.html


I'm actually going to be making some more transgenic flies (in real life) pretty soon. Hopefully it will go well!

20090124

Genetic engineering and more fluorescence...

Asaad asks a really good question about the safety of sticking random genes into people. To be honest, I can’t give you a definite answer about whether sticking GFP into a human would be harmful or not because, as far as I know, it has never been tried. One major ethical concern about genetic engineering in humans is that we can’t be 100% certain what sticking a gene into a person would do until we actually do the experiment. This is less of a problem for conventional pharmaceuticals, because you can recruit volunteers who are informed about the risks. But a person who isn’t even born yet obviously isn’t around to make that sort of decision! A person who has been genetically engineered would be stuck with that for the rest of his or her life. And you are right that the children of that person could inherit the gene. (They would probably have a 50% chance of inheriting it if it was carried on one of the parent’s chromosomes.) Whether or not it would ever be justified to make that sort of decision for someone is a very serious ethical question! All that said, though, my guess is that GFP would probably be safe to have floating around inside your cells. As far as we can tell, it doesn’t seem to do much of anything (aside from glowing) when you stick it into the cells of other organisms. So there isn’t any reason to think that it would be harmful…though it probably isn’t work risking it just for fun! As for how fluorescence works…that’s a really cool story. You may have talked a bit about atoms in one of your science classes. If you remember, atoms are made of nuclei (made of positively-charged protons and uncharged neutrons) orbited by negatively-charged electrons. The electrons are in things called orbitals. You can think of an orbital as like a “cloud” of electrons with a particular shape. (If you study quantum mechanics someday, you’ll learn that electrons in orbitals can be thought of as waves too…that’s a weird thing to think about!).

Well anyway, atoms can combine in different ways to form molecules. When this happens, the electron orbitals from all the individual atoms fuse into new orbitals called molecular orbitals. When the molecule is just hanging out (i.e. when the light is off), those electrons are generally in the lowest-energy orbitals possible. However, when a particle of light (a photon) with the right energy interacts with the electrons, they can absorb the energy in the photon and jump up to a higher-energy orbital. The molecule is in what is called an excited state. However, this excited state is unstable. Think of it as sort of like a pencil balanced on its tip. Maybe the molecule can exist in that state for a split second, but it wants to get back to its ground state. In some molecules, the electron just falls back to its low-energy state and the energy from the light is lost as heat. But in some special molecules (like the molecules of the fluorescein that I brought you), something really cool happens where the molecule emits a new particle of light when the electron falls from its excited state back down to its low-energy state. This is the light that you observe as fluorescence. The new photon of light is a different color than the original photon of light because some of the energy is typically lost in the process of kicking the electron up to a high-energy state and letting it fall back down again. I hope that wasn’t too unclear! Let me know if you have any more questions!

Note: 1 nanosecond = 1/1,000,000,000 second
1 picosecond = 1/1,000,000,000,000 second
1 femtosecond = 1/1,000,000,000,000,000 second!!!!!!

What's really crazy is that people have figured out ways to observe things this fast! One of the people who figured out how to do this won the Nobel Prize. See: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1999/illpres/

20090114

Thanks again!

Thanks so much for letting me give a presentation for you guys! I had a lot of fun, and I enjoyed meeting all of you. I want you to know that I was incredibly impressed with what you knew already, and I was even more impressed by the sorts of questions that you asked. Being able to ask good questions is one of the hallmarks of a good scientist. If you have any more questions that I didn’t get to answer, please post them as comments on my blog, and I would love to try to answer them. (And if I don’t know the answer, I will try my best to find out.) Also, good luck to those of you who are going to the science fair! I’m sure you’ll do great.

I will keep posting new stuff on my blog (and I’ll try to get friends of mine at UChicago to post stuff as well), so I hope all of you will keep in touch. If you have any suggestions, feel free to add comments.

- Thomas a.k.a. “The Gene Dude”

Thanks again!

Thanks so much for letting me give a presentation for you guys! I had a lot of fun, and I enjoyed meeting all of you. I want you to know that I was incredibly impressed with what you knew already, and I was even more impressed by the sorts of questions that you asked. Being able to ask good questions is one of the hallmarks of a good scientist. If you have any more questions that I didn’t get to answer, please post them as comments on my blog, and I would love to try to answer them. (And if I don’t know the answer, I will try my best to find out.) Also, good luck to those of you who are going to the science fair! I’m sure you’ll do great.

I will keep posting new stuff on my blog (and I’ll try to get friends of mine at UChicago to post stuff as well), so I hope all of you will keep in touch. If you have any suggestions, feel free to add comments.

- Thomas a.k.a. “The Gene Dude”

20090105

Math in the Movies

Just another way math is important...